Diet and obesity

From WikiMD
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Diet plays an important role in the genesis of obesity. Personal choices, advertising, social customs and cultural influences, as well as food availability and pricing all play a role in determining what and how much an individual eats.

Dietary energy supply

Average per capita energy consumption of the world from 1961 to 2002

The dietary energy supply is the food available for human consumption, usually expressed in kilocalories per person per day. It gives an overestimate of the total amount of food consumed as it reflects both food consumed and food wasted.[2] The per capita dietary energy supply varies markedly between different regions and countries. It has also changed significantly over time.[3] From the early 1970s to the late 1990s, the average calories available per person per day (the amount of food bought) has increased in all part of the world except Eastern Europe and parts of Africa. The United States had the highest availability with 3654 calories per person in 1996.[4] This increased further in 2002 to 3770.[5] During the late 1990s, Europeans had 3394 calories per person, in the developing areas of Asia there were 2648 calories per person, and in sub-Sahara Africa people had 2176 calories per person.[4][6]

Average calorie consumption

Change over time of the macronutrient composition of the US male diet.
Change over time of the macronutrient composition of the US female diet.
USDA chart showing the increase in soda consumption and the decrease in milk consumption from 1947 to 2001.[7]

From 1971 – 2000, the average daily number of calories which women consumed in the United States increased by 335 calories per day (1542 calories in 1971 and 1877 calories in 2000). For men, the average increase was 168 calories per day (2450 calories in 1971 and 2618 calories in 2000). Most of these extra calories came from an increase in carbohydrate consumption rather than an increase in fat consumption.[8] The primary sources of these extra carbohydrates were sweetened beverages, which now accounts for almost 25 percent of daily calories in young adults in America.[9] As these estimates are based on a person's recall, they may underestimate the amount of calories actually consumed.[8]

Fast food

As societies become increasingly reliant on energy-dense fast-food meals, the association between fast food consumption and obesity becomes more concerning.[10] In the United States consumption of fast food meal has tripled and calorie intake from fast food has quadrupled between 1977 and 1995.[11] Consumption of sweetened drinks is also believed to be a major contributor to the rising rates of obesity.[12][13]

Portion size

A comparison of a typical cheeseburger 20 years ago (left) which had 333 calories with a modern cheeseburger (right) which contains 590 calories as per the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute

The portion size of many prepackage and restaurant foods has increased in both the United States and Denmark since the 1970s.[8] Fast food servings, for example, are 2 to 5 times larger than they were in the 1980s. Evidence has shown that larger portions of energy-dense foods lead to greater energy intake and thus to greater rates of obesity.[14][15]

Sugar consumption

Existing evidence from large-scale cross-sectional and prospective cohort studies supports that consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages is correlated with the childhood and adult obesity epidemic in the United States population (Malik et al. 2006). Sweetened drinks containing either sucrose alone or sucrose in combination with fructose appear to lead to weight gain due to increase energy intake.[16] Fructose might also be preferentially metabolized into fat as feedback inhibition as with glucose is missing.[17] In fact, about half of total added sugar consumed in the United States is in liquid form.[18] Teenage boys showed the greatest consumption of sugar sweetened beverages, upwards of 357 calories per day.[18] In addition to the evidence that humans have a natural propensity towards sugar,[19] there exists additional biological plausibility that explains the correlation of sugar-sweetened beverage consumption and obesity.[20]

A study by the National Center for Health Statistics showed that non-Hispanic black men consumed a larger percentage of their total calories from added sugars than non-Hispanic white and Mexican-American men. Non-Hispanic black men consumed 14.5% of their calories from added sugars compared with 12.8% for non-Hispanic white men and 12.9% for Mexican-American men. Non-Hispanic black women also consumed a larger percentage of their total calories from added sugars than non-Hispanic white and Mexican-American women. Non-Hispanic black women consumed 15.2% of their calories from added sugars compared with 13.2% for non-Hispanic white women and 12.6% for Mexican-American women. No significant differences in percentage of calories from added sugars were found between non-Hispanic white and Mexican-American men or women.[21]

Sugar-sweetened beverages raise concern because they are calorie-dense and yet produce low satiety.[22] There exists a strong correlation between the consumption of liquid calories and total energy intake. Individuals do not tend to decrease solid calories in compensation for increased liquid calories.[20] For example, if there were no compensation for liquid calories, the 40-50g of sugar in each 12 oz. can of soda drunk on a daily basis could lead to a 15 pound weight gain per year.[20] On the national scale, the American Heart Association estimates that approximately half of the total caloric intake increase over the past 30 years is attributable to liquid calories.[23] The high glycemic load of these beverages is also thought to be a contributor to chronic disease, including diabetes [22] and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.[24] Furthermore, there is emerging evidence that suggests sugar may be an addictive substance, further potentiating any individuals’ existing problem of excessive consumption.[19]

The soda industry budget for advertising in 2000 totaled over $700 million in the US, an increase of over $381 million since 1986.[18] Furthermore, standard serving sizes have increased from 8-ounce to 12-ounce bottles between 1977-1996.[18] Price incentives from beverage companies have kept their product prices low.[25]

Social policy and change

Agricultural policy and techniques in the United States and Europe have led to lower food prices. In the United States, subsidization of corn, soy, wheat, and rice through the U.S. farm bill has made the main sources of processed food cheap compared to fruits and vegetables.[26]

Participation by adults in the United States Department of Agriculture Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (i.e. Food Stamps) is positively associated with obesity, waist circumference, elevated fasting glucose, and metabolic syndrome.[27]


Evidence does not support the commonly expressed view that some obese people eat little yet gain weight due to a slow metabolism. On average obese people have a greater energy expenditure than normal weight or thin people and actually have higher BMRs.[28][29] This is because it takes more energy to maintain an increased body mass.[30] Obese people also underreport how much food they consume compared to those of normal weight.[31] Tests of human subjects carried out in a calorimeter support this conclusion.[32]

See also



Featured disease

Metabolic syndrome is a cluster of the most dangerous heart attack risk factors: diabetes and prediabetes, abdominal obesity, high triglycerides, low HDL cholesterol and high blood pressure.

Affects one in three adults

Affecting about 35 percent of all adults in the United States according to the CDC, metabolic syndrome contributes to weight gain, by causing a state of internal starvation called metabolic starvation. This in turn leads to increases hunger, sugar cravings and increased portions leading to overeating and weight gain.

Cause and effect misunderstood

Since we traditionally thought that the portion control (which in turn was attributed wrongly to poor will power)is the cause of weight gain, rather than the effect of this metabolic starvation, all our traditional ideas about cause and effect of obesity were not only wrong but lead to the “blame the victim” attitude when it comes to obesity.

Secret of weight gain revealed

Secret of weight gain, and metabolic syndrome revealed - it has been recently proven that metabolic syndrome, and the weight gain itself are caused by a process called insulin resistance. Check your metabolic syndrome risk using the free Metabolic syndrome meter. Watch this amazing Ted Med video that reveals the secret of weight loss - Stop blaming the victim for obesity

  1. 1.0 1.1 "Compendium of food and agriculture indicators - 2006". Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved February 18, 2009.
  2. "Compendium of food and agriculture indicators - 2006". FAO. Retrieved February 18, 2009. ----
  3. "Compendium of food and agriculture indicators - 2006". UN Food and Agriculture Organization. Archived from the original on August 2, 2008. Retrieved January 10, 2009.
  4. 4.0 4.1 "Calories per capita per day" (gif). UN Food and Agriculture Organization. Retrieved January 10, 2009. ----
  5. "" (PDF). UN Food and Agriculture Organization. Retrieved January 10, 2009.
  6. "USDA: frsept99b". USDA. Retrieved January 10, 2009.
  7. "In the Long Run" (pdf). USDA. Retrieved February 17, 2009.
  8. 8.0 8.1 8.2
  9. 18.0 18.1 18.2 18.3 Woodward-Lopez G, Kao J, Ritchie L. (2010) To what extent have sweetened beverages contributed to the obesity epidemic? Public Health Nutrition 14(3), 499-509.
  10. 19.0 19.1 Avena, N.M., Rada, P., Hoebel, B.G. Evidence for sugar addiction: Behavioral and neurochemical effects of intermittent, excessive sugar intake. Neuroscience Biobehavioral Review 2008; 32(1) 20-39.
  11. 20.0 20.1 20.2
  12. Ervin, R.B. and C.L. Ogden. (2013). Consumption of Added Sugars Among U.S. Adults, 2005-2010. Hyattsville, Md.: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics.
  13. 22.0 22.1 Hu, F., Malik, V. Sugar-sweetened beverages and risk of obesity and type II diabetes: epidemiologic evidence. Physiology and Behavior. 2010; 100: 47-54.
  14. Johnson, R.K., Appel, L.J., Brands, M., Howard, B.V., Lefevre, M., Lustig, R.H., Sacks, F., Steffen, L.M., Wylie-Rosett, J. Dietary sugars intake and cardiovascular health: a scientific statement from the American heart association. Circulation. (2009) 120: 1011-1020.
  15. Assy, N. Nasser, G. Kamayse, I., Nseir, W., Beniashvili, Z., Djibre, A., Grosovski, M. Soft drink consumption linked with fatty liver in the absence of traditional risk factors. Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology. (2008). 22(10) 811-816.
  16. Brownell, K.D., Farley, T., Willett, W.C., Popkin, B.M., Chaloupka, F.J., Thompson, J.W., Ludwig, D.S. The public health and economic benefits of taxing sugar-sweetened beverages. The New England Journal of Medicine. (2009) 361(16) 1599-1605.
  17. Pollan, Michael (22 April 2007). "You Are What You Grow". New York Times. Retrieved 2007-07-30.
  18. Crowe, Tim. "Monday's medical myth: 'my slow metabolism makes me fat'". Retrieved 15 November 2013.
  19. "mdPassport". Retrieved December 31, 2008.

Ad. Tired of being overweight? W8MD's insurance weight loss* program can HELP | Advertise on WikiMD

Disclaimer: The entire contents of WIKIMD.ORG are for informational purposes only and do not render medical advice or professional services. If you have a medical emergency, you should CALL 911 immediately! Given the nature of the wiki, the information provided may not be accurate and or incorrect. Use the information on this wiki at your own risk! See full Disclaimer. * Individual results may vary.