Calorie restriction

From WikiMD
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Calorie restriction (CR), or caloric restriction, is a dietary regimen that is based on low calorie intake. "Low" can be defined relative to the subject's previous intake before intentionally restricting calories, or relative to an average person of similar body type. Calorie restriction without malnutrition has been shown to work in a variety of species, among them yeast, fish, rodents and dogs to decelerate the biological aging process, resulting in longer maintenance of youthful health and an increase in both median and maximum lifespan.[1]

The long-term effects of moderate CR with adequate intake of nutrients on humans are unknown.[2]

Two main lifespan studies have been performed involving nonhuman primates (rhesus monkeys). One, begun in 1987 by the National Institute on Aging, published interim results in August 2012 indicating that CR confers health benefits in these animals, but did not demonstrate increased median lifespan; maximum lifespan data are not yet available, as the study is still ongoing.[3] A second study by the University of Wisconsin beginning in 1989 issued preliminary lifespan results in 2009,[1][4][5] and final results in 2014.[6] It found that CR primates were only 36.4% as likely to die from age-related causes when compared with control animals, and had only 56.2% the rate of death from any cause. Template:TOC limit

Effects on humans

The long-term effects of moderate CR with adequate intake of nutrients on humans are unknown.[2]

Negative effects

Severe or extreme CR may result in serious deleterious effects, as it has been shown in the Minnesota Starvation Experiment.[7] This study was conducted during World War II on a group of lean men, who restricted their calorie intake by 45% for 6 months.[7] As expected, this severe degree of CR resulted in many positive metabolic adaptations (e.g. decreased body fat, blood pressure, improved lipid profile, low serum T3 concentration, and decreased resting heart rate and whole-body resting energy expenditure), but also caused a wide range of negative effects, such as anemia, lower extremity edema, muscle wasting, weakness, neurological deficits, dizziness, irritability, lethargy, and depression.[7]

Musculoskeletal losses

Short-term studies in humans report loss of muscle mass and strength and reduced bone mineral density.[8]

The authors of a 2007 review of the CR literature warned that "[i]t is possible that even moderate calorie restriction may be harmful in specific patient populations, such as lean persons who have minimal amounts of body fat."[9]

Low BMI, high mortality

CR diets typically lead to reduced body weight, yet reduced weight can come from other causes and is not in itself necessarily healthy. In some studies, low body weight has been associated with increased mortality, particularly in late middle-aged or elderly subjects. Low body weight in the elderly can be caused by pathological conditions associated with aging and predisposing to higher mortality (such as cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, or depression) or of the cachexia (wasting syndrome) and sarcopenia (loss of muscle mass, structure, and function).[10] One of the more famous of such studies linked a body mass index (BMI) lower than 18 in women with increased mortality from noncancer, non−cardiovascular disease causes.[11] The authors attempted to adjust for confounding factors (cigarette smoking, failure to exclude pre-existing disease); others argued that the adjustments were inadequate.[12]

"epidemiologists from the ACS (American Cancer Society), American Heart Association, Harvard School of Public Health, and other organizations raised specific methodologic questions about the recent Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) study and presented analyses of other data sets. The main concern ... is that it did not adequately account for weight loss from serious illnesses such as cancer and heart disease ... [and] failed to account adequately for the effect of smoking on weight ... As a result, the Flegal study underestimated the risks from obesity and overestimated the risks of leanness."[13]

Such epidemiological studies of body weight are not about CR as used in anti-aging studies; they are not about caloric intake to begin with, as body weight is influenced by many factors other than energy intake. Moreover, "the quality of the diets consumed by the low-BMI individuals are difficult to assess, and may lack nutrients important to longevity."[2] Typical low-calorie diets rarely provide the high nutrient intakes that are a necessary feature of an anti-aging calorie restriction diet.[14][15][16] As well, "The lower-weight individuals in the studies are not CR because their caloric intake reflects their individual ad libitum set-points, and not a reduction from that set-point."[2]

Triggering eating disorders

In those who already suffer from a binge-eating disorder, calorie restriction can precipitate an episode of binge eating, but it does not seem to pose any such risk otherwise.[17]

Young or pregnant

Long-term calorie restriction at a level sufficient for slowing the aging process is generally not recommended in children, adolescents, and young adults (under the age of approximately 21), because this type of diet may interfere with natural physical growth, as has been observed in laboratory animals. In addition, mental development and physical changes to the brain take place in late adolescence and early adulthood that could be negatively affected by severe calorie restriction.[18] Pregnant women and women trying to become pregnant are advised not to practice calorie restriction, because low BMI may result in ovulatory dysfunction (infertility), and underweight mothers are more prone to preterm delivery.[18]

Miscellaneous concerns

It has also been noted that people losing weight on such diets risk developing cold sensitivity, menstrual irregularities, and even infertility and hormonal changes.[19]


Even though there has been research on CR for over 70 years, the mechanism by which CR works is still not well understood.[1] Some explanations include reduced cellular divisions, lower metabolic rates, reduced production of free radicals,[20] reduced DNA damage[21][22] and hormesis.[23]


Research has pointed toward hormesis as an explanation. Southam and Ehrlich (1943) reported that a bark extract that was known to inhibit fungal growth actually stimulated growth when given at very low concentrations. They coined the term "hormesis" to describe such beneficial actions resulting from the response of an organism to a low-intensity biological stressor. The word "hormesis" is derived from the Greek word "hormaein", which means "to excite". The (mito)hormesis hypothesis of CR proposes that the diet imposes a low-intensity biological stress on the organism, which elicits a defensive response that helps protect it against the causes of aging. In other words, CR places the organism in a defensive state so that it can survive adversity, resulting in improved health and longer life. This switch to a defensive state may be controlled by longevity genes (see below).[24]

Mitochondrial hormesis

Mitochondrial hormesis was a purely hypothetical concept until late 2007, when work by Michael Ristow's group on a small worm named Caenorhabditis elegans suggested that the restriction of glucose metabolism extends life span primarily by increasing oxidative stress to stimulate the organism into having an ultimately increased resistance to further oxidative stress.[25] This is probably the first experimental evidence for hormesis being the reason for extended life span following CR.

Although aging can be conceptualized as the accumulation of damage, the more recent determination that free radicals participate in intracellular signaling has made the categorical equation of their effects with "damage" more problematic than was commonly appreciated in the past. It was previously proposed on a hypothetical basis that free radicals may induce an endogenous response culminating in more effective adaptations that protect against exogenous radicals (and possibly other toxic compounds).[26] Recent experimental evidence strongly suggests that this is indeed the case, and that such induction of endogenous free-radical production extends the life span of a model organism and mitohormetically exerts life-extending and health-promoting effects. Sublethal mitochondrial stress with an attendant stoichiometric augmentation of reactive oxygen species may precipitate many of the beneficial alterations in cellular physiology produced by caloric restriction.[27][28][29]


It has been recently argued that during years of famine, it may be evolutionarily desirable for an organism to avoid reproduction and to up-regulate protective and repair enzyme mechanisms to try to ensure that it is fit for reproduction in future years. This argument seems to be supported by recent work studying hormones.[30] A study on male mice found that CR generally feminizes gene expression, and that many of the most significantly changed individual genes are involved in aging, hormone signaling, and p53-associated regulation of the cell cycle and apoptosis; it concluded that the life-extending effects of CR may arise partly from a shift toward a gene expression profile more typical of females.[31] Prolonged severe CR lowers total serum and free testosterone while increasing SHBG concentrations in humans; these effects are independent of adiposity.[32]

Lowering of the concentration of insulin and substances related to insulin, such as insulin-like growth factor 1 and growth hormone, has been shown to up-regulate autophagy, the repair mechanism of the cell.[33] A related hypothesis suggests that CR works by decreasing insulin levels and thereby up-regulating autophagy,[33][34] but CR affects many other health indicators, and it is still undecided whether insulin is the main concern.[35] Calorie restriction has been shown to increase DHEA in primates, but it has not been shown to increase DHEA in post-pubescent primates.[36][37] The extent to which these findings apply to humans is still under investigation.

Chromatin and PHA-4

Evidence suggests that the biological effects of CR are closely related to chromatin function.[38] A study conducted by the Salk Institute for Biological Studies and published in the journal Nature in May 2007 determined that the gene PHA-4 is responsible for the longevity behind calorie restriction in roundworms, "with similar results expected in humans".[39]

Free radicals and glycation

Two very prominent proposed explanations of aging that have a bearing on calorie restriction are the free radical theory and the glycation theory. With high amounts of energy available, mitochondria do not operate very efficiently and generate more superoxide. With CR, energy is conserved and there is less free radical generation. A CR organism will have less fat and require less energy to support the weight, which also means that there does not need to be as much glucose in the bloodstream.

Less blood glucose means less glycation of adjacent proteins and less fat to oxidize in the bloodstream to cause sticky blocks resulting in atherosclerosis. Type 2 diabetics are people with insulin insensitivity caused by long-term exposure to high blood glucose. Type 2 diabetes and uncontrolled type 1 diabetes are much like "accelerated aging", due to the above effects. There may even be a continuum between CR and the metabolic syndrome.

Reduced DNA damage

Calorie restriction reduces production of reactive oxygen species (ROS).[20][40] ROS cause several types of DNA damage including 8-hydroxy-2’-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG). The level of 8-OHdG is often used as an indicator of the general level of oxidative damage in DNA.

Sohal et al. observed that caloric restriction decreased 8-OHdG damages in the DNA of mouse, heart, skeletal muscle, brain, liver and kidney. The levels of 8-OHdG in the DNA of these organs in 15 month old mice were reduced to an average of 81% of that in the DNA of mice fed an unrestricted diet.[41] Kaneko et al. observed that, in rats, dietary restriction retarded the onset of age-related increases in 8-OHdG in nuclear DNA of brain, heart, liver and kidney. The level of 8-OHdG in these organs of the calorie restricted rats at 30 months averaged 65% of the level in rats fed an unrestricted diet.[42] Hamilton et al. found that dietary restriction in both mice and rats reduced the age-related levels of 8-OHdG. In rats aged 24–26 months that had been fed a calorie restricted diet, the level of 8-OHdG in heart, skeletal muscle, brain and kidney DNA was, on average, 62% of the level in rats fed an unrestricted diet. In mice, after a calorie restricted diet for 24–26 months, the level of 8-OHdG in heart, brain, liver and kidney DNA averaged 71% of the level in mice fed an unrestricted diet.[43] Also, Wolf et al. observed that, in the rat, calorie restriction reduced 8-OHdG in the DNA of heart, skeletal muscle, brain and liver. After 24 months, the levels of 8-OHdG in these organs averaged 64% of those in the rats fed an unrestricted diet.[44]

Thus in rodents, calorie restriction slows aging, decreases ROS production and reduces the accumulation of oxidative DNA damage in multiple organs. These results link reduced oxidative DNA damage to slower aging. The consistent observation that calorie restriction reduces oxidative DNA damage lends support to the proposal of Holmes et al. that oxidative DNA damages are a prominent cause of aging.[22] This is also discussed in detail by Bernstein et al.[45]

Caloric restriction mimetics

Work on the mechanisms of CR has given hope to the synthesizing of future drugs to increase the human life span by simulating the effects of calorie restriction. In particular, the large number of genes and pathways reported to regulate the actions of CR in model organisms represent attractive targets for developing drugs that mimic the benefits of CR without its side effects.[46][47][48] However, MIT biologist Leonard Guarente cautioned that "(treatment) won't be a substitute for a healthy lifestyle. You'll still need to go to the gym."[49]

Sir2, or "silent information regulator 2", is a sirtuin, discovered in baker's yeast cells, that is hypothesized to suppress DNA instability.[50] In mammals, Sir2 is known as SIRT1. David Sinclair at Harvard Medical School in Boston is a leading proponent of the view that the gene Sir2 may underlie the effect of calorie restriction in mammals by protecting cells from dying under stress.[51] It is suggested that a low-calorie diet that requires less Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide to metabolize may allow SIRT1 to be more active in its life-extending processes. An article in the June 2004 issue of the journal Nature showed that SIRT1 releases fat from storage cells.[52]


Attempts are being made to develop drugs that act as CR mimetics, and much of that work has focused on a class of proteins called sirtuins.[53] Resveratrol has been reported to activate SIRT1 and extend the lifespan of yeast,[54] nematode worms, fruit flies,[55] vertebrate fish,[56] and mice consuming a high-caloric diet.[57] However, resveratrol does not extend life span in normal mice[58] and the effect of resveratrol on lifespan in nematodes and fruit flies has been disputed.[59]

There are studies that indicate that resveratrol may not function through SIRT1[60][61] but may work through other targets.[62][63] A clinical trial of the resveratrol formulation SRT501 was suspended.[64]

There is some evidence from mice that caloric restriction may be mediated through SIRT3[65] or SIRT6.[66]


The first person to promote calorie restriction as a means of prolonging life was Luigi Cornaro, a 15th century Venetian nobleman who adopted a calorie restricted diet at age 35 to address his failing health. His restricted diet cured of all of his ailments in less than a year, and he went on to live to be 102 years old.[67] His book Discorsi della vita sobria (Discourses On the Temperate Life) described his regimen, which centered on the "quantifying principle" of restricting himself to only 350 grams of food daily (including bread, egg yolk, meat, and soup) and 414 milliliters of wine. The book was extremely successful, and "was a true reconceptualization of old age. As late as the Renaissance it was largely the negative aspects of this phase of life which were emphasized ... Cornaro’s method offered the possibility for the first time not only of a long but also a worthwhile life."[68]

In 1934, Mary Crowell and Clive McCay of Cornell University observed that laboratory rats fed a severely reduced calorie diet while maintaining micronutrient levels resulted in life spans of up to twice as long as otherwise expected. These findings were explored in detail by a series of experiments with mice conducted by Roy Walford and his student Richard Weindruch. In 1986, Weindruch reported that restricting the calorie intake of laboratory mice proportionally increased their life span compared to a group of mice with a normal diet. The calorie-restricted mice also maintained youthful appearances and activity levels longer and showed delays in age-related diseases. The results of the many experiments by Walford and Weindruch were summarized in their book The Retardation of Aging and Disease by Dietary Restriction (1988) (ISBN 0-398-05496-7).

The findings have since been accepted and generalized to a range of other animals. Researchers are investigating the possibility of parallel physiological links in non-human and human primates. In the meantime, many people have independently adopted the practice of calorie restriction in some form.

Two randomized control studies on the effects of CR in non-human primates have been conducted: the Wisconsin National Primate Research Center and the National Institute on Aging CR monkey studies. In 1989, scientists at University of Wisconsin started a study involving 46 adult male and 30 female rhesus monkeys.[1][4] The National Institute on Aging CR monkeys study, started in 1987, involves 60 male and 60 female rhesus monkeys. Monkeys in both studies have been randomized with a 1:1 ratio to 30% CR or to a control diet. Results are being periodically published.

A group of scientists at Washington University in St.Louis have studied long-term physiologic, metabolic and molecular effects of CR in a small group of healthy lean men and women.[69]

In May 2007 a multi-center clinical trial called the CALERIE ( Comprehensive Assessment of the Long-term Effects of Reducing Energy Intake) study was begun, to examine the effect of 2 years of sustained 25% CR on: a) slowing aging as assessed by proxy indicators and b) protecting against age-related disease processes. 220 healthy volunteers across 3 sites (Tufts University, Pennington Biomedical Research Center, and Washington University School of Medicine) were recruited.[70]

A study at UCSF called "CRONA" was started in December 2010, and studied 28 long-term CR practitioners over a few months.[71] The study was completed on September 20, 2011.[72] As of August 2012 the results had not yet been published.



One set of experiments shows that CR has no benefits in the housefly.[73] The authors hypothesize that the widely purported effects of CR may be because a diet containing more calories can increase bacterial proliferation, or because the type of high-calorie diets used in past experiments have a stickiness, general composition, or texture that reduces longevity.

At one time, some researchers suggested that some of the effects of CR are artifacts because the laboratory model organisms are kept on non-physiological high-calorie diets. This would mean that calorie restriction simply means mimicking the energy supply of a natural environment.[74] However, many modern CR studies restrict the control animals by 10–20% below their ad libitum intake in order to avoid confounding by obesity. Additionally, "at least some laboratory mice under a caloric restriction regimen that maximizes longevity have been reported to cease estrous cycling. Because all existing wild mice populations must reproduce or become extinct, presumably they are eating relatively more than restricted laboratory mice during at least part of the year."[75] A study designed to evaluate the energy intake, expenditure, and balance of mice in the wild, ad libitum–fed laboratory mice, and calorie-restricted mice concluded that "CR experiments do in fact restrict energy consumption beyond that typically experienced by mice in nature. Therefore, the retarded aging observed with CR is not due to eliminating the detrimental effects of overeating."[76]


Several studies have been conducted on calorie restriction in non-human primates. One found positive effects on lifespan and a variety of aging-related diseases.[5][6] Another found reductions in several age-related diseases, but no difference in median lifespan; maximum lifespan has not been reported as the study is still ongoing.[77] One hypothesis is that the animal's genetics and the quality of the food are more important than the quantity.[78]


Seventy years ago, C. M. McCay et al. discovered that reducing the amount of calories fed to rodents nearly doubled their life spans. The life extension varied for each species, but on average there was a 30–40% increase in life span in both mice and rats.[35] CR preserves a range of structural and functional parameters in aging rodents. For example, studies in female mice have shown that estrogen receptor-alpha declines in the aging pre-optic hypothalamus. The female mice that were given a calorically restricted diet during the majority of their lives maintained higher levels of ERα in the pre-optic hypothalamus than did their non–calorically restricted counterparts.[79] On the other hand, in a recent survey of 41 laboratory mouse strains, 40% caloric restriction shortened lifespan in more strains than in which it lengthened it,[80] suggesting that effects of caloric restriction may be modified by genetic background and/or other factors, and that the relationship between CR and longevity in mice may be more complex than previously thought.

Studies in female mice have shown that both the Supraoptic nucleus (SON) and Paraventricular nucleus (PVN) lose about one-third of IGF-1R immunoreactivity with normal aging. Old calorically restricted mice lose higher numbers of IGF-1R non-immunoreactive cells while maintaining similar counts of IGF-1R immunoreactive cells in comparison to Old-Al mice. Consequently, Old-CR mice show a higher percentage of IGF-1R immunoreactive cells, reflecting increased hypothalamic sensitivity to IGF-1, in comparison to normally aging mice.[81][82]


Fungi models are very easy to manipulate, and many crucial steps toward the understanding of aging have been made with them. Many studies were undertaken on budding yeast and fission yeast to analyze the cellular mechanisms behind increased longevity due to calorie restriction. First, calorie restriction is often called dietary restriction because the same effects on life span can be achieved by only changing the nutrient quality without changing the amount of calories. Data from Dr Guarente, Dr Kennedy, Dr Jazwinski, Dr Kaeberlein, Dr Longo, Dr Shadel, Dr Nyström, Dr Piper, and others showed that genetic manipulations in nutrient-signaling pathways could mimic the effects of dietary restriction. In some cases, dietary restriction requires mitochondrial respiration to increase longevity (chronological aging), and in some other cases not (replicative aging). Nutrient sensing in yeast controls stress defense, mitochondrial functions, Sir2, and others. These functions are all known to regulate aging. Genes involved in these mechanisms are TOR, PKA, SCH9, MSN2/4, RIM15, SIR2, etc.[83][84][85][86][87] Importantly, yeast responses to CR can be modulated by genetic background. Therefore, while some strains respond to CR with increased lifespan, in others CR shortens it [88]

Caenorhabditis elegans

Recent work on Caenorhabditis elegans, a free-living, transparent nematode (roundworm), has shown that restriction of glucose metabolism extends life span by primarily increasing oxidative stress to exert an ultimately increased resistance against oxidative stress, a process called (mito)hormesis.[25]


Studies have been conducted to examine the effects of CR with adequate intake of nutrients in humans; however, long-term effects are unknown.[2]

Biomarkers for cardiovascular risk

A review of the effects of CR on the aging heart and vasculature concluded that "Data from animal and human studies indicate that [beyond the effects of "implementation of healthier diets and regular exercise"], more drastic interventions, i.e., calorie restriction with adequate nutrition (CR), may have additional beneficial effects on several metabolic and molecular factors that are modulating cardiovascular aging itself (e.g., cardiac and arterial stiffness and heart rate variability)."[89] Studies of long-term practitioners of rigorous CR show that their risk factors for atherosclerosis are substantially improved in a manner consistent with experimental studies in rodent models of atherosclerosis and nonhuman primates.[89] Risk factors such as c-reactive protein; serum triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein, high-density lipoprotein; blood pressure; and fasting blood sugar, are substantially more favorable than persons consuming usual Western diets and comparable or better than long-term endurance exercisers.[89] Similar effects were also seen during a "natural experiment" in Biosphere 2,[89] and in subjects in the “Minnesota Starvation Experiment” during World War II.[7] Cardiac "diastolic function was better in subjects who practiced strict CR for 3–15 years than that in healthy age- and sex-matched control subjects ... CR subjects had less ventricular stiffness and less viscous loss of diastolic recoil, both of which would be consistent with less myocardial fibrosis.[89] "These effects, in combination with other benefits of CR, such as protection against obesity, diabetes, hypertension, and cancer, suggest that CR may have a major beneficial effect on health span, life span, and quality of life in humans."[89]

Biomarkers for cancer risk

Long-term CR in humans results in a reduction of several metabolic and hormonal factors that have been associated with increased risk of some of the most common types of cancer in developed countries, consistent with similar shifts in CR rodents and nonhuman primates, in whom CR affords substantial protection against cancer morbidity and mortality.[90][91][90] These include lower levels of total and abdominal fat, circulating insulin, testosterone, estradiol, and inflammatory cytokines linked to cancer.[91] Long-term CR can also reduce levels of serum Insulin-like growth factor 1 in humans, and increase levels of IGFBP-3; however, unlike in rodents, this effect can be blocked if dietary protein is not reduced to the Dietary Reference Intake.[91]

Concerns and Confounders

Activity levels

Calorie restriction preserves muscle tissue in nonhuman primates[92][93] and rodents.[94][95] Mechanisms include reduced muscle cell apoptosis and inflammation;[94] protection against[95] or adaptation to[92] age-related mitochondrial abnormalities; and preserved muscle stem cell function.[96] Muscle tissue grows when stimulated, so it has been suggested that the calorie-restricted test animals exercised more than their companions on higher calories, perhaps because animals enter a foraging state during calorie restriction. However, studies show that overall activity levels are no higher in CR than AL animals in youth,[97] while CR animals are more active at middle age and beyond due to a protective effect against the decline in activity observed in middle-aged and older animals.[98]

Amino acids for exercise

Exercise has also been shown to increase health and life span and lower the incidence of several diseases (relative to sedentary and obese controls, but not to energy-restricted sedentary controls of matching body weight).[99] Calorie restriction comes into conflict with the high caloric needs of athletes, and may not provide them sufficient energy levels or amino acids for repair, although this is not a criticism of CR per se, since it is certainly possible to be an unhealthy athlete or an athlete destined to die at a young age due to poor diet, stresses, etc. Moreover, in experiments comparing CR to exercise, CR animals lived much longer than exercised animals.[100]

Age of Onset

There is some evidence suggesting that the benefit of CR in rats might only be reaped in early years. A study on rats that were gradually introduced to a CR lifestyle at 18 months showed no improvement over the average life span of the ad libitum group.[101] This view, however, is disputed by Spindler, Dhahbi, and colleagues, who showed that in late adulthood, acute CR partially or completely reversed age-related alterations of liver, brain and heart proteins, and that mice placed on CR at 19 months of age showed increases in life span.[102] The Wisconsin rhesus monkey study showed increased survival rates and decreased diseases of aging from caloric restriction even though the study started with adult monkeys.[103]

Larger organisms

Another objection to CR as an advisable lifestyle for humans is the claim that the physiological mechanisms that determine longevity are very complex, and that the effect would be small to negligible in our species.[104] Several of the biological changes observed in animals with longer life spans on CR have already been observed in humans which proponents argue suggests that the life-extending properties of CR will extend to humans.[105]

Activity level

Laboratory rodents placed on a CR diet tend to exhibit increased activity levels (particularly when provided with exercise equipment) at feeding time. Monkeys undergoing CR also appear more restless immediately before and after meals.[106] Despite this brief daily period of increased activity overall activity is no higher in CR than AL animals in youth after an initial period of adaptation to the diet.[97] On the other hand, CR has been found to retard the decline in activity that occurs during normal aging: in one study, animals on a conventional diet "showed little activity" by early middle age, while those on CR "were observed to run around the cage and climb onto and hang from the wire cage tops throughout their life spans. In fact, the longest surviving [CR] mouse was observed hanging from the top of his cage only 3 days before he became moribund."[98]

Stereotyped behavior

Observations in some accounts of animals undergoing CR have noted an increase in stereotyped behaviors.[106] For example, monkeys on CR have demonstrated an increase in licking, sucking, and rocking behavior.[107]


A CR regimen may also lead to increased aggressive behavior in animals.[106]

See also




Featured disease

Metabolic syndrome is a cluster of the most dangerous heart attack risk factors: diabetes and prediabetes, abdominal obesity, high triglycerides, low HDL cholesterol and high blood pressure.

Affects one in three adults

Affecting about 35 percent of all adults in the United States according to the CDC, metabolic syndrome contributes to weight gain, by causing a state of internal starvation called metabolic starvation. This in turn leads to increases hunger, sugar cravings and increased portions leading to overeating and weight gain.

Cause and effect misunderstood

Since we traditionally thought that the portion control (which in turn was attributed wrongly to poor will power)is the cause of weight gain, rather than the effect of this metabolic starvation, all our traditional ideas about cause and effect of obesity were not only wrong but lead to the “blame the victim” attitude when it comes to obesity.

Secret of weight gain revealed

Secret of weight gain, and metabolic syndrome revealed - it has been recently proven that metabolic syndrome, and the weight gain itself are caused by a process called insulin resistance. Check your metabolic syndrome risk using the free Metabolic syndrome meter. Watch this amazing Ted Med video that reveals the secret of weight loss - Stop blaming the victim for obesity


  • The Retardation of Aging and Disease by Dietary Restriction Richard Weindruch, Roy L. Walford (1988). ISBN 0-398-05496-7
  • Ageless Quest. Lenny Guarente, Cold Spring Harbor Press, NY. 2003. ISBN 0-87969-652-4.
  • Caloric Restriction and Aging Richard Weindruch in Scientific American, Vol. 274, No. 1, pages 46–52; January 1996.
  • 2-Deoxy-D-Glucose Feeding in Rats Mimics Physiological Effects of Caloric Restriction. Mark A. Lane, George S. Roth and Donald K. Ingram in Journal of Anti-Aging Medicine, Vol. 1, No. 4, pages 327—337; Winter 1998.
  • Eat more, weigh less, live longer, New Scientist, January 2003.
  • Interview, "I want to live forever", Cynthia Kenyon, Professor of Biochemistry and Biophysics at the University of California, San Francisco, by James Kingsland. New Scientist online, 20 October 2003.
  • Interview, Longevity and Genetics, Matt Kaeberlein, Brian Kennedy. SAGE Crossroads
  • Fasting fosters longevity in rats. Science News, Vol. 116, No. 22: 375, 1 December 1979.


Calories and Nutritional Information of Foods


52 weeks of weight loss and wellness videos

Glossary of healthy eating | Nutritional value of foods: UK Foods | US Foods | Dietary Supplements | Nutrition values of foods | Nutrition lookup (USDA) Portions of content adapted from Wikipedias article on Calorie restriction licensed under GNU FDL.



Featured disease

Metabolic syndrome is a cluster of the most dangerous heart attack risk factors: diabetes and prediabetes, abdominal obesity, high triglycerides, low HDL cholesterol and high blood pressure.

Affects one in three adults

Affecting about 35 percent of all adults in the United States according to the CDC, metabolic syndrome contributes to weight gain, by causing a state of internal starvation called metabolic starvation. This in turn leads to increases hunger, sugar cravings and increased portions leading to overeating and weight gain.

Cause and effect misunderstood

Since we traditionally thought that the portion control (which in turn was attributed wrongly to poor will power)is the cause of weight gain, rather than the effect of this metabolic starvation, all our traditional ideas about cause and effect of obesity were not only wrong but lead to the “blame the victim” attitude when it comes to obesity.

Secret of weight gain revealed

Secret of weight gain, and metabolic syndrome revealed - it has been recently proven that metabolic syndrome, and the weight gain itself are caused by a process called insulin resistance. Check your metabolic syndrome risk using the free Metabolic syndrome meter. Watch this amazing Ted Med video that reveals the secret of weight loss - Stop blaming the victim for obesity

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4
  3. Kolata, Gina (2012-09-29). "Severe Diet Doesn't Prolong Life, at Least in Monkeys". The New York Times.
  4. 4.0 4.1
  5. 5.0 5.1
  6. 6.0 6.1
  7. 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 Keys A, Brozek J, Henschels A & Mickelsen O & Taylor H. The Biology of Human Starvation, 1950, Vol. 2, p. 1133. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis
  8. Holzman, Donald (2005-05-27). "Panel Suggests Methodology Flawed of Recent CDC Obesity Study". Medscape Medical News. Retrieved 2011-02-21.
  9. 18.0 18.1 "Risks". Retrieved 2010-07-28.
  10. 20.0 20.1 Sohal RS, Ku HH, Agarwal S, Forster MJ, Lal H. (1994). Oxidative damage, mitochondrial oxidant generation and antioxidant defenses during aging and in response to food restriction in the mouse. Mech Ageing Dev 74(1-2) 121-133. PMID 7934203
  11. Sohal RS, Agarwal S, Candas M, Forster MJ, Lal H. (1994). Effect of age and caloric restriction on DNA oxidative damage in different tissues of C57BL/6 mice. Mech Ageing Dev 76(2-3) 215-224. PMID 7885066
  12. 22.0 22.1 Holmes GE, Bernstein C, Bernstein H. (1992). Oxidative and other DNA damages as the basis of aging: a review. Mutat Res 275(3-6) 305-315. PMID 1383772
  13. Hormesis: A Revolution in Biology, Toxicology and Medicine By Mark P. Mattson, Edward J. Calabrese
  14. 25.0 25.1
  15. [Charlie Rose- Calorie restriction]
  16. 33.0 33.1
  17. 35.0 35.1
  18. "The gene for longevity, if you're a worm". ABC News. 2007. Retrieved 2007-05-03.
  19. Gredilla R, Sanz A, Lopez-Torres M, Barja G. (2001). Caloric restriction decreases mitochondrial free radical generation at complex I and lowers oxidative damage to mitochondrial DNA in the rat heart" FASEB J 15(9) 1589-1591. PMID 11427495
  20. Sohal RS, Agarwal S, Candas M, Forster MJ, Lal H. (1994). Effect of age and caloric restriction on DNA oxidative damage in different tissues of C57BL/6 mice" Mech Ageing Dev 76(2-3) 215-224. PMID 7885066
  21. Kaneko T, Tahara S, Matsuo M. (1997). Retarding effect of dietary restriction on the accumulation of 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine in organs of Fischer 344 rats during aging. Free Radic Biol Med 23(1) 76-81. PMID 9165299
  22. Hamilton ML, Van Remmen H, Drake JA, Yang H, Guo ZM, Kewitt K, Walter CA, Richardson A. (2001). Does oxidative damage to DNA increase with age?" Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98(18) 10469-10474. PMID 11517304
  23. Wolf FI, Fasanella S, Tedesco B, Cavallini G, Donati A, Bergamini E, Cittadini A. (2005). Peripheral lymphocyte 8-OHdG levels correlate with age-associated increase of tissue oxidative DNA damage in Sprague-Dawley rats. Protective effects of caloric restriction. Exp Gerontol 40(3) 181-188. PMID 15763395
  24. Bernstein, H., Payne, C.M., Bernstein, C., Garewal, H., Dvorak, K. (2008). Cancer and aging as consequences of un-repaired DNA damage. In: New Research on DNA Damages (Editors: Honoka Kimura and Aoi Suzuki) Nova Science Publishers, Inc., New York, Chapter 1, pp. 1-47.
  25. Vergano, Dan (3 May 2007). "Longevity gene linked to low-calorie diets". USA Today. Retrieved 2007-05-03.
  26. Suspended Resveratrol Clinical Trial: More Details Emerge(May 6, 2010)
  27. Heidi Ledford for Nature News. February 22, 2012 Sirtuin protein linked to longevity in mammals: Male mice overproducing the protein sirtuin 6 have an extended lifespan.
  28. Cava E et al. Will calorie restriction work in humans? Aging (Albany NY).2013 Jul;5(7):507-14.
  29. Rickman AD et al. The CALERIE Study: Design and methods of an innovative 25% caloric restriction intervention Contemp Clin Trials. 2011 November; 32(6): 874–881.
  30. Fernandez, Elizabeth (18 April 2011). "Extreme Dieting: Does It Lead to Longer Lives?". UCSF News Center. UCSF. Retrieved 2011-09-02.
  31. "Long-term Caloric Restriction and Cellular Aging Markers - Full Text View". Retrieved 2012-11-10.
  32. Calorie restriction falters in the long run Nature News, August 29, 2012
  33. C. Y. Liao, B. A. Rikke, T. E. Johnson, V. Diaz, J. F. Nelson (2010) Genetic variation in the murine lifespan response to dietary restriction: from life extension to life shortening. Aging Cell 9:92-95. PMID 19878144
  34. J. Schleit, B.M. Wasko, M. Kaeberlein, Yeast as a model to understand the interaction between genotype and the response to calorie restriction, FEBS Lett 586 (2012) 2868-2873. PMID=22828279
  35. 89.0 89.1 89.2 89.3 89.4 89.5
  36. 90.0 90.1 Calle EE, Kaaks R. Overweight, obesity and cancer: epidemiological evidence and proposed mechanisms. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004 Aug;4(8):579-91
  37. 91.0 91.1 91.2
  38. 92.0 92.1
  39. 94.0 94.1
  40. 95.0 95.1
  41. 97.0 97.1
  42. 98.0 98.1 Means, L. W., Higgins, J. L., & Fernandez, T. J. (1993). Mid-life onset of dietary restriction extends life and prolongs cognitive functioning. Physiology & Behavior, 54, 503–508.
  43. J. O. Holloszy and K. B. Schechtman (1991-04-01). "Interaction between exercise and food restriction: effects on longevity of male rats". Retrieved 2012-11-10.
  44. Washington University School of Medicine. "Calorie Restriction Appears Better Than Exercise At Slowing Primary Aging." ScienceDaily 31 May 2006. 24 April 2009 <>.
  45. Reduced Diet Thwarts Aging, Disease In Monkeys Science Daily, July 10, 2009
  46. "CR can increase maximum life span of all the creatures in which it's been tested, by anywhere from 40 to 60 percent on extreme versions of CR. Several studies in humans commenced in 2002, and even the short-term changes in the subjects' biomarkers already match those observed in other animal species that have been studied at length, which strong suggests that the CR effect is truly universal in the animal kingdom." pg 23 in The Longevity Diet 2 ed. by Brian Delaney and Lisa Walford
  47. 106.0 106.1 106.2 Vitousek, K. M., Manke, F. P., Gray, J. A., & Vitousek, M. N. (2004). Caloric Restriction for Longevity: II--The Systematic Neglect of Behavioural and Psychological Outcomes in Animal Research. European Eating Disorders Review, 12(6), 338-360.
  48. Weed, J. L., Lane, M. A., Roth, G. S., Speer, D. L., & Ingram, D. K. (1997). Activity measures in rhesus monkeys on long-term calorie restriction. Physiology & Behavior, 62, 97–103.

Ad. Tired of being overweight? W8MD's insurance weight loss* program can HELP | Advertise on WikiMD

Other languages:

Disclaimer: The entire contents of WIKIMD.ORG are for informational purposes only and do not render medical advice or professional services. If you have a medical emergency, you should CALL 911 immediately! Given the nature of the wiki, the information provided may not be accurate and or incorrect. Use the information on this wiki at your own risk! See full Disclaimer. * Individual results may vary.